For me, philosophy is not just historical knowledge about individual thinkers and their ideological considerations of the universe. Philosophy for me something broader and more fundamentally deep. Broad - for the reason that philosophy, like any other science, is a comprehensive humanitarian science in its classical interpretation.
Deep - for the reason that philosophy, causes, dokopalis to the depths of the consciousness, will descend to the earth.
Deep - for the reason that philosophy, causes, dokopalis to the depths of the consciousness, will descend to the earth.
Philosophy, in my opinion, is the science of interpreting. Only in a verbal dispute born worthy thoughts (though if you take the forums in the Internet, it is also sometimes possible to pokerati out useful thoughts and views on the topics discussed. I close ancient philosophy times Diogenes Laerte. This time can be called a child of our culture and philosophy. The philosophers of that time were easier to understand than the modern, their thoughts were logical and simple. Modern philosophy, in my opinion, has apostilas and became boring science is designed for the modern world. The world of evil, selfishness, money and things. We began to think much about external welfare than about the inner world, the world of sensations and feelings, we have become hostages of things.
1. Is there a confrontation in our time, religious or mythological and scientific Outlook in society?
2. Whether conscious worldview person?
3. Why in Ancient Greece did not invent the steam engine?
4. Implemented if in our time the project of the Enlightenment?
5. The philosophy of positivism is the source of the dispute "physicists" and "lyrics".
6. "There is no God. And when will it be?" He does science prove the truth of materialism?
7. The metaphor of a vision or What it means to "see"?
8. Every human activity is the essence of ordering, and what are the sources and reasons of chaos (mess)?
9. The benefit of one - damage to another.
10. Philosophy of science: medicine or poison?
11. Philosophical dimension of scientific discovery.
12. What problems raised in the Russian philosophy of the 19th century, concerned philosophers of modern Russia?
13. Genius and evil - two incompatible things?..
14. Should you eat to live, not live to eat?..
15. How much a human need?
16. You cannot embrace the boundless.
17. Infinity depth and breadth.
18. Mixing: order and chaos.
19. After this, therefore because of this.
20. Can I not make sense to give meaning or senseless to make meaningful?
21. How we think and live.
22. Carnal condition for the reproduction of man is evil?
2. Whether conscious worldview person?
3. Why in Ancient Greece did not invent the steam engine?
4. Implemented if in our time the project of the Enlightenment?
5. The philosophy of positivism is the source of the dispute "physicists" and "lyrics".
6. "There is no God. And when will it be?" He does science prove the truth of materialism?
7. The metaphor of a vision or What it means to "see"?
8. Every human activity is the essence of ordering, and what are the sources and reasons of chaos (mess)?
9. The benefit of one - damage to another.
10. Philosophy of science: medicine or poison?
11. Philosophical dimension of scientific discovery.
12. What problems raised in the Russian philosophy of the 19th century, concerned philosophers of modern Russia?
13. Genius and evil - two incompatible things?..
14. Should you eat to live, not live to eat?..
15. How much a human need?
16. You cannot embrace the boundless.
17. Infinity depth and breadth.
18. Mixing: order and chaos.
19. After this, therefore because of this.
20. Can I not make sense to give meaning or senseless to make meaningful?
21. How we think and live.
22. Carnal condition for the reproduction of man is evil?
We have forgotten ancestors and made idols. We burned the story and wrote a new language of war and repression. We killed in self conscience and poisoned humanity money. Our society crucified Christ on the mount from the bodies of the Gentiles, and delivered him, forcing him to take the rap for our sins forever. Philosophy has zakamuflirovanie and hid from the eyes of the public by the toga of the complex and little use of terms, complicating philosophy to understand and apply. We can say that everything is already written, and all has been said in philosophy, but why not the right questions? Why we are searching for answers not knowing what they're for?
Philosophy is something without which I could not exist as a person. The man who thinks, is always voprosami, but only by accident, you can answer them correctly: Why? Why? Maybe not so? How?
Philosophy should not give the right answers, it aims to point the right direction in finding the right questions.
Approximately one is my philosophy.